Users’ objection to Kalaberg’s new standards; Curb inflation, we don’t want goods

- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_img
- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_img



According to Khabaronline news agency, while The poverty line of a family of three is estimated to be at least 27 million tomansThe government says that for a 500,000 tomans increase in Kalaberg, a family of 4 should have an income of less than 27 million tomans.

Income criteria were questioned

One of the most important axes of users’ protest is the determination of the income limit of 20 million tomans for three-person households and 27 million tomans for four-person households. The audience says that these figures do not correspond to the real cost of living, and it is not possible to evaluate the living conditions of households by just considering the monthly income.

Referring to the cost of housing and family expenses, one of the users wrote: “Someone who does not have a house, there are four people, how can he live with 27 million, half of this amount is only the rent of the house, now let alone the cost of education and food… you should get at least 40 to 50.”

Referring to the installments and debts of the households, another user wrote: “Most of the households took various loans from the bank to live on because they are renters, and more than three-fourths of the households’ income is spent on bank loan installments or manual borrowing.” Today’s poverty is not below 50 million.

Referring to his financial situation, a retiree wrote: “I get a salary of 31 tomans, but I have 20 tomans in bank installments. Consider bank installments as well.

They also cut off the same product as before

The issue of discontinuing the validity of Kalaberg is another one of the most frequent complaints of the audience. Some users say that not only the credit increase has not been credited to their account, but the previous credit has also been cut off.

One of the audience wrote in the beginning of the comments: “Currently, they have cut off my one million.” Another user also criticized the government’s support policies and said: “Not only not increasing, but also cutting, in this process, the government only multiplied the goods.”

Referring to his personal experience, another user wrote: “I am less than 27, but it is not active for me.” Also, referring to the situation of low-income households and having worn-out cars, a user wrote: “I know a family of three who barely make ends meet and their house rent is paid with the help of others. They have great pride who travel; Think that the product list has not been added because he has a car.”

Decimals are unrealistic

Some audiences have complained about the sudden change in their income tax and the difficulty of following up on protests. One of the users named Farrokh Ahmadpour Qalami, who introduced himself as elderly and without insurance and pension, wrote that despite the decrease in his monthly income from four million to three million and 900 thousand tomans, his tithe has changed from one to eight and then to nine.

He also wrote about the follow-up of his protest, that when he went to the counter office, he was told that the response to the protest may take about six months. Another part of the comments is dedicated to the inadequacy of the increase in the price of goods. Users believe that even if they pay this amount, the increase in the cost of basic goods and other living expenses will neutralize its effect.

One of the audience wrote ironically: “500 thousand tomans!” You can buy two puffs with it.” Referring to the increase in food prices, another user wrote: “Chicken is 150 thousand tomans, 450 thousand tomans, meat is 1 million to 2 million, then you want to remove it.” To what rights? Have our salaries increased?”

Another audience also believes that the increase in the credit of Kalaberg is insignificant compared to the increase in household expenses and wrote that against the increase of 500 thousand tomans in Kalaberg, the monthly expenses of families have increased by more than 30 million tomans.

Curb inflation, we don’t want goods

A significant part of the comments is devoted to criticizing the government’s performance and distrusting the promises of support. One of the users wrote: “The government removed the preferred currency and gave a charity called Kalaberg, and inflation skyrocketed, now it says it will not give to the needy.” Everyone became poor with your policies. Which has?

Referring to the government’s promises, another respondent wrote: “These governments always make a promise first, but then they cannot manage it.” Another user emphasized to the president: “Mr. President, listen to your words and keep your promise.” Among these reactions, one of the users considered the main solution not to increase subsidies and goods, but to curb inflation and wrote: “Control inflation, we didn’t ask for goods.”

Also, referring to the policy of removing the preferred currency, a person wrote: “You took the currency, you said I will give Rials, now take Rials too.”

223223



Source link

- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_img
Latest news
- Advertisement -spot_img
Related news
- Advertisement -spot_img

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here