While criticizing the double approach of the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency in condemning the attack on the nuclear facilities, the delegation of Iran in Vienna stated: “During the bombing of Iran’s facilities, Grossi considered condemnation to be outside his scope of work.”
Admirably, the phrase “strongly condemns” could clearly be used by Rafael Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Iranian delegation in Vienna wrote in a statement on X social media on Monday. But why is it not consistently applied in all situations?
According to IRNA, the delegation continued by referring to a picture of Grosz in which he condemned the killing of a Zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant in Ukraine: when the bombs of the United States and the Israeli regime hit Iran’s peaceful and protected nuclear facilities, which was unprecedented in the history of the agency, or when Iran’s nuclear scientists were assassinated, these actions were never condemned. In those situations, the director-general apparently considered conviction outside his “scope” and “work.”
In the continuation of this statement, it is stated: Selective anger and protest is not one of the pillars of nuclear safety and safeguards; Rather, it is one of the pillars of creating a resume and promoting a job position.
Institutional and organizational responsibility is not optional. Professionalism requires adherence and consistent and stable performance.
