Alireza Najmi: Every day a sign of negotiation And a sign of the possibility of military confrontation is seen in the political atmosphere of Iran and America; A situation that still does not provide a clear perspective for both sides.
On the one hand, news and speculations are being published about the continuation of negotiations and the possibility of resuming the path of diplomacy, and on the other hand, some media reports about the departure of the Iranian delegation from Doha on Sunday and the negative progress of the negotiations have added to the uncertainties.
However, it can’t be said yet The result of these conversations or had a possible time to reach a definitive evaluation agreement. In such a situation, the main question is that Negotiations between Iran and the United States To what extent is it possible to overcome the current impasse and what factors can change the course of diplomacy?
On the eve of the American mid-term elections, Washington’s political calculations have become one of the important variables of this equation; Can approaching elections affect the decisions of the US government regarding Iran?
In the same direction Ahmad Aryaninejad, representative of Malair in the Islamic Council In an interview with Khabar Online about the negotiations between Iran and the United States, he said: Even in a hundred years from now, if you enter into negotiations with your enemies without having the power, they will not give you any points, and in my interpretation, you will not get anything except imposing your wishes. The enemy gives you points when you have power.
He added: “If I were not a servant, write in history that it has not been recorded in history that someone waits for the arrogant world to give him points or recognize him and finally reach such a conclusion.”
In response to the question of whether we should build nuclear weapons or not, Aryani Nejad said: We will take any possible and necessary measures to defend the country. We are talking about defense, not war. Please reflect this correctly that we are not war-seekers and we want peace and tranquility, but we have to fight to maintain peace.
The description of the conversation Ahmad Aryaninejad, representative of Malair in the Islamic Council You will read below;
**************************
* Considering the media speculations that the Qatari delegation left Doha on Sunday, what do you think about the process of negotiations between Iran and the United States?
We do not negotiate at all; What exists now is simply the transfer of Iran’s conditions. Negotiation means bargaining and talking to reach an agreement, while this is not on our agenda.
This issue is neither consistent with the statements of our martyrs nor consistent with our beliefs to sit at the table with the enemy who wronged us and say now let’s get along. Is the issue a simple family issue that can be easily passed over?
be for everyone’s sake; Even in a hundred years from now, if you enter into negotiations with your enemies without having power, they will not give you any concessions, and in my interpretation, you will get nothing but the imposition of your wishes. “The enemy gives you points when you have power.”
If I were not a servant, write in history that it has not been recorded in history that someone waits for the arrogant world to give him points or recognize him and finally reach such a conclusion. You will not achieve such a thing. The problem is not only Iran; Arrogant powers seek blackmail and should not be expected to give you a favor without having the power.
* If we do not negotiate, what other solution is there? Should you just fight?
yes
How long should we be at war?
Until we get our right.
*If the country’s infrastructure is targeted in the war you are considering, what will be the result?
Yes, it is possible to be targeted, wasn’t it Vietnam? Aren’t there Afghanistan and Iraq? As the Supreme Leader has said, the damage in compromise is much more than the cost of resistance. In addition, we are not tied hands and today’s conditions are different from the past. America’s heme is broken and they are now looking to make gains so they can use it to get votes in the elections.
* What do you think about the fact that some representatives are proposing to withdraw from the NPT? Do you have the same opinion?
This is a long story. We remain in this agreement until Grossi comes, conducts inspections, collects information and finally makes false statements against us. The question is, what have we achieved in these assemblies?
Whenever the US has felt that a treaty or other agreement is not worth it, it has abandoned it and withdrawn from it. The human rights organizations do not actually take effective action. We need to examine why countries like Israel and Pakistan have achieved nuclear technology and capabilities without being a member of the NPT, but we are still facing restrictions and pressure despite being a member of this treaty.
Staying in this agreement not only did not prove our rightness, but it only caused us more restrictions and harassment. The reports that are presented against Iran, contrary to reality, show how beneficial this membership has been for us. Therefore, one should ask what is the benefit of continuing to participate in such an agreement for the country?
Question: Nevertheless, do you believe in making nuclear weapons?
We do whatever is possible and necessary to defend the country; We are talking about defense, not war. Please reflect this correctly that we are not war-seekers and we want peace and tranquility, but we have to fight to maintain peace.
Sometimes they make proposals to fight and advance their goals with the slogan of peace, but we fight for peace and stand and defend our country. If we are weak and retreat, the other party will advance many times more.
Question: Do you consider war probable?
Due to the military formation and regional movements, there is a possibility of conflict. Trump himself has been threatening Iran for a long time. In my opinion, these public threats that they intend to attack Iran can be pursued in terms of international law, and Iran can take the lead in this matter; However, I think it is unlikely that there will be any effective action from these international bodies and authorities.”
Although I believe that we are also under the influence of arrogant powers in international judicial and propaganda authorities, I would like to point out an example. In Iran, the issue of Mahsa Amini happened while, according to me, there was no proven reason for assault or assault, but after that, our country was involved in chaos and unrest for about eight months.
When Jamal Khashoggi was murdered in Türkiye, why didn’t we see an effective response from these institutions? Against the genocides and crimes that have occurred in Bosnia, Afghanistan, Iraq and Gaza, why is no effective voice heard from these assemblies? These issues show that the international human rights authorities are not effective in practice and in today’s world, instead of the rule of law, the law of the jungle rules; That is, if a country is weak, it will be under pressure and suffer damage.
Even some powers do not hide their real goals and talk about economic and oil interests. We see an example of it in the case of Venezuela. I don’t know why some people have short term memory and don’t remember these events.
Our way is only to become stronger. We hope that these topics related to negotiation and dialogue will be an opportunity to strengthen our strength. Just as the 12-day war and the 40-day war revealed some of our weaknesses and provided the basis for their elimination.
We have no choice but to strengthen our defense. If a burglar wants to break into your house, would you tell him to wait until I go buy bread and come back? Naturally, you should prepare yourself to deal with such a threat and provide the means of self-defense.
29221
