According to Khabaronline news agency, the head of Basij Mustafafin organization, this morning (Tuesday) at the closing ceremony of the first scientific league “Nupaya” which was held in Fatemeh Al-Zahra (S) camp, pointed out the difference in the views of nations about the concept of a good life and stated: Enjoying a good life is the common desire of all people and societies, but the fundamental difference is in the definition that each school and worldview offers of this concept.
Hossein Taib explained two different views on life and added: In one view, seeking pleasure and achieving personal benefits even at the cost of trampling on the rights of others is a desirable standard of life, and in another view, human life is not limited to the world and happiness has a meaning beyond material life. The choice between these two approaches is also up to humans.
The head of the Basij Mustafein organization explained two thought patterns in international relations: a thought system divides the world into two groups, dominating and dominating, and sees its progress as dependent on depriving other nations of their rights, resources, and scientific capacities. In such an attitude, powerful countries set the ceiling of scientific progress for other nations and even expect the elites of developing countries to go to America to serve their interests; But the opposite model is based on the principle that one should neither oppress others nor allow the rights and dignity of a nation to be violated. The Iranian nation has chosen this path and wants progress and prosperity without violating the rights of others and without accepting domination.
Referring to the American policies before the victory of the Islamic Revolution, Taib said: Since 1965, the Americans have considered Iran and Saudi Arabia as their regional supports by implementing the so-called two-pillar security strategy in the Middle East. Considering Iran’s oil resources, wealth and manpower, they tried to turn our country into the gendarme of the region in order to secure the economic and military interests of the United States, prevent the Soviet Union from accessing the waters of the region, and guarantee the security of the Zionist regime.
Referring to the Iranian nation’s stand against these policies, he pointed out: The Iranian people stood up against the Pahlavi authoritarian regime and the rule system, and despite the repression and shooting of students, they continued the path of the revolution until victory. At that time, an important part of the country’s academic centers and strategic infrastructures were under the influence of the Americans, and the major share of Iran’s resources was allocated to foreigners in oil contracts.
The head of Basij Mustafafin organization continued: In order to consolidate their influence, the Americans even placed the head of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in the position of the country’s ambassador to Iran and organized a wide network of their affiliated forces. Advanced military equipment was also provided to the Iranian army in such a way that its training and operational guidance depended on America; In the sense that Iran’s military capacity will serve the interests of Washington.
Pointing to America’s effort to maintain influence after the victory of the Islamic Revolution, Taib said: Americans formed espionage and communication networks through their embassy in Tehran and tried to organize monarchist currents and opposition groups to prevent the establishment of the government based on the will of the people. Therefore, the students following the line of Imam (RA) stood against this conspiracy by capturing the spy nest.
Referring to the change in America’s approach in dealing with the Islamic Republic of Iran, he said: Americans emphasized on the continuation of domineering relations in 2020, but after failing to achieve their goals, they gradually moved from combined and hybrid war to military confrontation. They had previously tried to hinder the country’s scientific progress by assassinating Iranian scientists, but they could not destroy Iran’s knowledge and nuclear technology.
The head of the Basij Mustafafin organization added: In the second and third imposed wars, the enemy tried to stop Iran’s access to nuclear knowledge by removing the country’s human capital by identifying scientists and university professors. These actions were even extended to students and showed that the enemy’s goal is not only to counter a certain technology, but to prevent the country’s scientific progress and independence.
Citing the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution’s definition of the concept of the elite, Taeb said: The elite is someone who is concerned about the development of his talents, considers himself an effective element in the society, and uses his abilities simultaneously for personal development and the development of the society.
Explaining the mission of the Basij Mustafafin organization in this field, he added: Our task is to provide the necessary platforms and infrastructures for identifying, nurturing and developing talents so that the flow of elitism and model making in the country accelerates. The goal is to provide Iran’s strategic needs in areas such as food security, energy security, and defense security, relying on the knowledge and ability of domestic experts.
In another part of his speech, the head of the Basij Mustafafeen organization, referring to the developments in the region and the statements of the American president about the destruction of Iran’s naval power, said: Americans are talking about the destruction of Iran’s navy and claiming to pass a certain amount of oil through the Strait of Hormuz, but they are still facing problems in managing the energy market and lowering the price of oil. If their claim about controlling the situation is true, why do they resort to the topic of negotiations to influence the price of oil? The fact is that the Strait of Hormuz has become one of the most influential factors in changing the balance of power.
He added: The pressures and economic blockade against the Iranian nation continue because the people of this land insist on their independence and rights. The Iranian people want a good life and progress, but they are not willing to trade their dignity and independence or to be under the burden of oppression to achieve it.
In the end, Taib emphasized by referring to the honorable verse “Rabbi Allahu thum’a staqamowa” that by God’s grace, the country’s scientific movement will continue with greater speed and by relying on faith, perseverance and internal capabilities, the ideal life will be provided for the people of Iran, Muslims and the oppressed of the world.
31216
