Alireza Najmi: Among the conflicting news from The path of diplomacy And repeated warnings about the possibility of military conflict are still unclear Iran-US relations In which direction does it move?
Although there have been signs of efforts to continue negotiations in recent days, media speculation about the Doha talks and reports that the Iranian delegation left Qatar on Sunday, without achieving a positive result, have once again raised doubts about the fate of diplomacy.
In such an atmosphere, it is impossible to fail Negotiations He spoke and there is no clear indication that an agreement is close. In the meantime, the American political calendar has also become an effective variable in the calculations of both sides. What effect will the US mid-term elections have on Washington’s approach towards Tehran? Is it possible for the US government to increase the pressure on Iran in order to manage the domestic space and show its power, or does it still prefer to follow the negotiation process?
On the other hand, how far Tehran can continue diplomatic route does it provide in the situation where military threats are still present? The important question is, in this ambiguous situation, how serious is the risk of returning to war and what signs can indicate a change in the direction of developments?
Our diplomacy is real diplomacy, not like American diplomacy
In this regard Hamidreza Guderzi, representative of Aliguderz in the Islamic Council Referring to the performance of the diplomatic system of the country, he told Khabar Online: “The issue of diplomacy and diplomatic knowledge is an area where, fortunately, the forces of our Ministry of Foreign Affairs have shone brightly in various negotiations. Their performance should really be appreciated. The measures taken by the Minister of Foreign Affairs and his deputies are definitely carried out in coordination with the officials and higher bodies of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.”
He added: “Our diplomacy is a real diplomacy, not like American diplomacy, which is mostly based on letter writing literature; In such a way that today they say something, but tomorrow they show a different behavior in practice. Unfortunately, Americans have adopted this style of writing; The method that is already familiar and well-known to us.”
Referring to Iran’s diplomatic meetings, Eliguderz’s representative in the Islamic Council said: “When our diplomatic system sits at the negotiating table in coordination with officials and high-ranking groups in various meetings, it faces repeated words and the same positions that Mr. Trump raises on various issues.”
He added: “Our positions in these meetings are the same as those presented in the seven-step plan, which, in my opinion, the diplomatic system has somewhat condensed and summarized and is following up on.”
Referring to the decision on the results of these meetings, Guderzi said: “In my opinion, the secretary of the Supreme National Security Council will announce the results of these negotiations, and the respected members should ultimately decide on it based on collective wisdom.”
We should not respond to Vance’s letter at all
Criticizing America’s approach in the negotiations, Hamidreza Gudarzi said: “Unfortunately, the Americans are not honest in their words, behavior and actions, and they instill in the international community as if only their positions are correct.”
He added: “In my opinion, this process is somewhat time-consuming, and various institutions should make a more serious decision so that we can end the situation of neither war nor peace.”
In response to a question about how to respond to J.D. Vance’s letter, Aliguderz’s representative in the Islamic Council said: “In my opinion, we should not respond to this letter at all. Why should we answer? Haven’t we replied to different letters yet? What was the result of these answers?”
Emphasizing the necessity of cooperation between the countries of the region to ensure stable security, he added: “The Persian Gulf countries and our neighbors should know that if stable security is to be established in the region, the cooperation of all the countries of the region is necessary. The war that happened has also had consequences for them; Therefore, they should try to mediate more accurately so that, God willing, we can end this war. In any case, the war is detrimental to all countries in the region.”
In response to a question about withdrawing from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) by some representatives and moving towards building nuclear weapons, Aliguderz’s representative in the Islamic Council said: “We cannot make a decision for the country just because a few members of the parliament make comments. “Each representative presents his personal opinion, and this does not necessarily mean the dominant position of the country.”
He added: “Of course, before any comment, we must weigh its aspects and consequences and see what harm or benefit it has for the country. In my opinion, all our positions and statements should be unified and there should be a certain coordination between the various institutions of the country, including the diplomatic apparatus, the parliament and the security groups and the forces that are present in the field.
Guderzi emphasized: “God forbid, this idea or message should not be transferred outside the country that there is a duality inside Iran.”
In response to a question about the possibility of war, Hamidreza Gudarzi said: “By sounding war drums, they are trying to create fear and panic among the people; But we are highly prepared and our armed forces have the necessary preparation.”
He added: “As soon as the other party makes the slightest mistake, the fire of war will definitely spread to everyone, and it is not just us who will be harmed.”
29221
