According to Khabar Online, Javan newspaper wrote: The history of giving political awards of this foundation to opposition figures shows that these awards are more like political tools and show validation for opponents of governments instead of appreciating freedom.
It is interesting that Germany did not allow the Pahlavis to speak in the gatherings of this event. Yasmin Pahlavi, who announced the awarding of this award to Reza Pahlavi in Frankfurt, Germany, further claimed that the German police informed them that they are not allowed to attend the rally and speak in it. In order to cover up the repetition of the past scandals, he stated the reason for this decision was threats to target the venue of the gathering, along with the civilians present in it, in the event of Reza Pahlavi’s presence. But a few hours later, Reza Pahlavi’s media office, struggling to overcome the German government’s ban on speaking at rallies, announced that he is still determined to attend the rally and that his team is working to coordinate with the police and security authorities. The action that shows that Germany’s mechanism, although it is giving a coefficient to Pahlavi elements to confront the Islamic Republic, in its heart, shows the gap between the political atmosphere of Pahlavi supporters and the practical approach of German institutions towards him.
On the other hand, the humiliating incident of a protester pouring tomato sauce on a Pahlavi dress while giving a speech behind a full-length glass wall in May in Munich was so disastrous that a German media called it “a scandal for Iran’s exiled crown prince”. In this regard, yesterday, an international expert expressed sadness over the burning of Reza Pahlavi and said that his every appearance in Germany was accompanied by an incident: from police disorder and attack with food coloring to the banning of his recent speech. According to him, the problem is not security, but Berlin’s political will, which limits the voice of Iranians (or anti-Iranian patriots) by taking the threat of the Islamic Republic seriously.
What is clear is that after America’s failure in the war, the Pahlavi circus has been activated again in Europe to gain the support of European governments for war and chaos. But in practice, the tour of this terrorist family has not yet reached the stage of performing the show, and it has caused a new scandal for them.
Holding this ceremony was accompanied by protests from some German authorities and parties, and they warned about the political consequences of such a decision, and some demanded its cancellation. The former Speaker of the Parliament, the former Minister of Justice and the former Ambassador of Germany to the United Nations together with some German parties announced that awarding an award in the name of the Iranian people to the son of the last Shah of Iran, who is a highly controversial figure, is not compatible with the values claimed by the foundation.
Some officials of the Frankfurt municipality also opposed holding the ceremony in the Paul Church of Frankfurt, which is a historical symbol of people’s sovereignty in this country. Although internationalizing the issue of regime change in Iran is one of the goals pursued by European governments, awareness of the inefficiency of the Pahlavi movement and the burning of this political element, along with international considerations and the possible costs of direct political confrontation with the Islamic Republic, have caused these governments to settle for limited and low-cost measures. Holding anti-Iranian meetings and speeches in limited circles and in parliamentary posts, such as Sweden, is similar to a propaganda show to inspire anti-Iranian and anti-patriotic elements. A show in which European governments avoid entering the more expensive and public stages of such failed projects as the chaos in December last year.
One of the reasons for Pahlavi’s recent actions to gain popularity in European political circles is to try to create internal chaos and gain their support for a war with Iran. During his recent trip to Brussels, Reza Pahlavi addressed the European Union and demanded to put as much economic pressure on the Iranian people as possible, an action that can create unrest and riots in the streets and make the war and bombing of Iran that he wanted more effective. On the other hand, what is contained in the statement of this German foundation was a kind of support for the movements of internal armed mercenaries under the title of protesters. Therefore, claiming freedom for Iran is considered artificial respiration to the internal rioting currents to re-implement terrorist acts in Iran.
Receiving the award from the German foundation revealed the internal divisions of the anti-Iranian currents. Hypocrites and separatists, who called him a dictator like his father, have strongly protested the awarding of Pahlavi and demanded an immediate review of this decision. Those who have not been able to get their share of the crimes against Iran from their employers, became nervous and unhappy that another terrorist got the award instead of them and they themselves were ignored. Of course, this is the end of all dependents and followers of the West. As the history of the Pahlavis shows, whenever they are used, they are easily discarded, and even today, their use as puppets for symbolization is valid.
17302
