According to Khabaronline news agency, Parviz Amini, a principled political figure and sociologist In the Khabaronline debate about “people’s resilience in existing conditions” with the presence of Ahmad Zeidabadi, a reformist political activist, in response to the question whether A small incident may cause the protests to repeat and even more violently, he said: considering that we have the experience of December after the 12-day war, why not repeat it again? This issue depends on several factors. As the threat of war decreases, economic and social discontent increases at the same time. If, on top of that, something like a sudden increase in prices or the gasoline incident happens, all these factors can provide the basis for a repeat of the protests of 1404, even more violently.
He continued: “To prevent such a situation, the government should pay attention to the issue of efficiency in crisis management.” The main problem of the country now is social resilience. One of the ways to increase this resilience is to focus on ending the war. The wise power of the country should make decisions according to the real conditions and external developments. It should be clear what is the final framework for the end of the war, a consensus should be formed about it and then it should be discussed with the society.
Stating that currently, there is no such dialogue with the society, Amini said: the antecedents and consequences of the decisions and the relationships between them should be explained to the people. It should be clear what is the logic of facing the problem and what is to be done. Ending the war should be prioritized and the situation should not be allowed to continue like this. If war condition or shadow of war situation continues, there should be a plan for it. The country is sometimes managed better than normal and routine conditions in crisis situations.
This principled sociologist said: One should make a specific decision, share it with the society and then implement it. The possibilities and capabilities of the country, both in the social and infrastructural fields, are not lacking; But you have to think and plan to use them, predict different scenarios, consider the worst scenario, talk to the public and then make decisions. Do not make explosive decisions. The decisions made in 2018, 1401 and 1404 regarding economic issues were among the most effective factors of the protests. The national media should also get out of the current situation. The media, if strong, is one of the most important tools of governance; But our media currently has no social authority.
Stating that during the war, Mr. Shahidifar launched a social program on the Nasim network, which is a non-universal network, he clarified: When the duration of that program ended, the television could not replace it with another program. This is a strange thing. During the war, you don’t even have the possibility to talk with the society about the consequences of the war, the atmosphere of war and the sympathies it requires. However, above all, we have hope for society; A society that has shown considerable maturity and efficiency. Despite the pressures on people, it is necessary to provide the ground for empathy, hope and cohesion.
Stating that an important part of social resilience is related to the performance of the executive branch, the fundamentalist political activist said: If I want to make a fair assessment, I would give a positive grade to the performance of the executive branch in war conditions. I am not saying that there were no problems, but in general, I give a passing grade to the record of the government of Mr. Medeshkian in the 12-day war and the 40-day war and after that, although I think the country could have been governed better. My assessment of the society and the armed forces is also much higher than expected; But I give the diplomacy and media apparatus a lower than average grade. These are the parts that need to be corrected.
29215
