Online news: The incident that happened to Mohammad Manan Raisi, the representative of Qom in the parliament at Mehrabad airport, became a place for the audience to open their hearts. RIssi in a note that he published onlinesaid, “Yesterday morning, I left for Khuzestan for a mission and went to the relevant gate at Mehrabad airport to receive my boarding pass. After seeing my ID card (Majlis card), the card delivery agent announced that I don’t accept this card and give me a national card! I told them that I am not used to going back and forth from the VIP section, and during these few years, I have often received the flight card with the same Majlis card and with the people, but this is the first time that I have heard that this card is not acceptable!”
He added, “In short, after my explanation, he announced that there is no problem, but he should see the picture of the national card; I also showed the picture of my national card on my phone and I thought that the problem was solved, but to my surprise, this time he made a new excuse and said that now I have to go to the airport security upstairs for authentication! I realized that he is one of those people who enjoy hurting people! I forced myself to call the deputy minister and head of the organization of Civil Aviation to avoid missing the flight, and finally the problem was solved with his quick intervention and the apology of the airport terminal manager!”
In the end, he likened this employee to the toilet attendant on the way, who instructed the customers what color sunscreen to use.
These statements caused the audience who read this news to show a strong reaction.
One audience wrote, “That servant of God did his duty and the head of the airline organization and you made a mistake. When you want to be with people, you should behave like everyone else. Everyone shows their national card, and who knows you when they accept you with a card other than the national card, do you show your parliament card to cook? The tail of that warm operator should be encouraged”; In response to this audience, two other people have reacted; One of them confirmed this opinion and the other rejected it: “What kind of person is a member of the parliament? He has to show a photo of his national card and enter the national code. The system will show people who are harassing people. You are probably one of the same people who are harassing people. They can go through the government door so that people like you don’t open their mouths.”
Vahid also wrote, “Why should that officer know the Majlis card?” How many people have seen the representative’s card? Like other people, you must have your national card with you when you fly. Another person wrote that “Hello, the law is not the same for everyone, but this taffeta is separate. Now, what would happen if the national card showed it?”
Arash, however, showed a sharper reaction and wrote, “How can people be expected to present a national card for identity verification? Then you and others like you consider yourself separate from the people of Tafte!! You probably consider the country as your absolute property!!!
Another audience also wrote, “The fact that he didn’t use VIP, which was his duty, what kind of message is he putting on the people. The airport employee should have demanded the original national ID card, not its picture, and he fully fulfilled his duty. Another criticized his call to the deputy minister and wrote, “The people you claim to be with can call the deputy minister and he will fall on the wrong side!”.
Another person also wrote, “Believe in God, the airport employee fulfilled his legal duty.” If you don’t have separate taffeta, you would show a national card like all other people, and peace be upon you. It was not necessary to justify the card and bother the deputy minister because of a flight card from “Khuzestan Kahraman”.
An audience also pointed to the story of the 11th parliament member’s confrontation with Rahour Naja traffic officer and wrote, “Of course, you should also interview that employee and don’t judge one-sidedly. Previously, the member of the parliament was under the soldier’s ear and wouldn’t accept it until his film was aired.”
But one audience has a completely different opinion from the other audiences: “He must have been an employee of the National Mossad and was upset by his master’s failure; domestic slave”. Another one praised Manan Raisi and wrote “Mr. Manan Raisi, God bless you.”
A visitor also wrote, “Perhaps with this airport employee, you will understand what is happening to people in government offices!!! And the representatives of the people are only spectators.”
“Now you didn’t have to remove the Majlis card! To understand the parliamentary lawyer. You wanted to show your national card like other ordinary people and go away. This is because people don’t like you because you don’t do anything for people. Salam”; “If you had shown your national card, the matter would have been resolved. Unless the MP came from the sky, so others should have his air. Don’t justify your bad work”; “How dutiful the airport officer was and acted correctly and lawfully, the member of parliament should respect and obey the law like other people. The representative’s work was wrong”; “I wish the respected representative would not use his influence and respect the law like all the people. What if the representative and all the responsible bodies would follow the law, there was no need to call”; “You had the power to call the deputy minister. If I was the type, I didn’t have anyone, my problem would have been solved in any way. I would have missed the flight”; These are other parts of Khabaronline audience’s comments on this news.
Reviewing the opinions shows that the absolute majority of the commentators are against this behavior of the MP and some accuse him of using influence and power; As far as the apology of the manager of the airport terminal.
Usually, public opinion reacts strongly to the use of influence and power; Regardless of the political direction of the representative or person.
2929
