According to Khabaronline news agency, Ayatollah Abulqasem Alidoost, a member of the community of teachers of Qom seminary, described Imam Khomeini’s (RA) jurisprudence as “stable” and “dynamic” and said: Imam Khomeini (RA) broadly says that jurisprudence – especially that jurisprudence is the basis for him and is also in his interpretations – should be treated in such a way that it takes into account the requirements of the time and is “dynamic”, and also has coherence and moderation. comply with the norms and be “reliable”. These are a set of characteristics that must be gathered in one person in order to say that this cleric is a cleric who is equal in the view and school of Imam Khomeini (RA).
According to Jamaran, you can read the important parts of this conversation below:
*The Arabs have a term and they say that so-and-so is a “Kunti man”; That is, the party keeps saying “Konto and Kadha and Kadha”; I was like this, for example, what did I do when I was young and now I am old. Some people’s judgments do not differ with respect to fields and even universities; Their judgments are “Konti” and they constantly want to say that you don’t know what was going on during the time of Mr. Borujerdi, or what it was like during the time of Haj Sheikh Abdul Karim in Najaf, for example, fifty years ago. I’m not saying it hasn’t been great, it’s definitely been good; But even now, as someone who believes that he must answer for his words on the Day of Judgment – that is, I want to say that I am neither flattering nor want to make unjustified whitewash – the situation is good. no We must say that he gets a good grade, but not an excellent grade; It is possible to have more output than this, to have efforts and not have some damages that I am mentioning now. But overall, I don’t see the situation as bleak. Many professors have been trained and are teaching and researching; The research that we see in the fields has never been as brilliant as it is now. But I repeat again, there are flaws.
*For example, one of the defects is that sometimes people who are powerful and their voices are loud, do not tolerate any kind of freedom thought. It is enough for him to believe in “Yajeb” – that is, it is obligatory – and a person in his thinking will come to the conclusion that “no Yajeb”; Or one believes in “Yahrum” and one believes in “Layahrum”; It is enough for them to say that this deviation is in jurisprudence and the deviation is in the method of inference and the method of inference, and they constantly reject it with hints and sarcasm. It is also strange that this atmosphere will soon prevail. You have seen that sometimes many people have political criticism, but they say: “Why cover up a secret that doesn’t hurt?” Let it go!” Some people are like this and say: “Why should we comment now? Let it go.” This is the dark spot; Of course, it always has been. Now you asked a scientific question and I don’t want to get into other topics. And if I want to say the positive and negative points of the ethical issues of the field and the financial and tuition issues of the students, they require other discussions, which was not your question. In my opinion, in two sentences: the situation is good, not great; And I wish that next to this good situation, there would be a space for the forces to show themselves and prove themselves.
*I was in the presence of one of the professors, it is very interesting to tell you; His lessons were in the afternoons. He was inclined to the opinion that hearing a woman’s voice is not permissible for an unmarried man; It means the original voice of a woman, not a voice with cuteness and charm! I called his house at night and had a question; Our communication was such that I would call so that they would pick up the phone and answer. Their lady picked up the phone! That’s it. If it is not right to hear the woman’s voice, why did the lady pick up the phone? Now say that it was done without the wife’s permission, without her knowledge, or even with her prohibition, which is unlikely! No, you see, sometimes we say something that is not applicable even in our own house. I don’t want to say that this is a jurisprudential reason – if some people hear my voice later, don’t wear their ottoman shirt – but it is not without reason that a jurist should consider and give an opinion on the capacities and feasibility.
Why was the late Imam drawn to the establishment of the Diagnosing Assembly? You know that work was sometimes blocked in the Guardian Council; It was really locked! In the story of the law of the Ministry of Labor, there was clause “C” and several other cases where the issue was locked. Sometimes he also gave instructions, but he felt that these elders should not listen to those instructions; Therefore, we were drawn to the evaluation committee, and let me tell you, the evaluation committee should be defined under the Guardian Council. And the assembly has a lot of work to do. In this section, he who wants to judge should be defined under the Guardian Council. What does it mean if we say that we will reject it in the morning in the Guardian Council and approve it in the afternoon in the evaluation assembly? If it is Shariah, approve it yourself in the morning; If it is illegal, reject it in the afternoon! They say: “No, we look at primary rules in the morning and secondary titles in the afternoon!” Was this also discussed? In any case, I will not enter into this discussion now, as it is a sensitive issue. These are the characteristics of his jurisprudence and behavior.
* The system, the country and the revolution want both a sniper and a thinker. A thinker who is just thinking does not take the place of a sniper and a frontline soldier, and a frontline soldier never takes the place of thinkers. Yes, we must be present in the field and defend the system with all our teeth. Just two or three days ago, I saw a clip of a woman that was very strange; Even though the lady was bad at hijab and didn’t wear hijab at all – now she was saying that I was wearing hijab and every office I went to, they said you should put the hijab on; I don’t know if he was right, wrong or lying, I don’t care – but he said one thing that still haunts me. He used to say: “Mr. Minister! Mr. Flan! Each of your seats has given 780 martyrs since you are sitting here!” This is a lot of talk; Maybe he didn’t even know what he was saying. But at that time we have everything we need; We want both fighters and thinkers.
* I wanted this to be my last sentence; You know that one of our problems since the beginning of the revolution was the “theoretical gaps” that we did not fill. That is, among these slogans, arguments and shouts – many of which were appropriate and I am not saying that they were inappropriate – those theoretical holes were not filled. If the theoretical holes are not filled, these slogans will collapse soon. Why did those events happen after the Prophet (PBUH)? Because the theoretical gaps were not filled. The Prophet did a lot of work, but there was still work left and the Prophet did not have time to do all this work; And therefore, when the Prophet passes away, many things go wrong.
