Nozer Rudneil said about the judgment of Vahid Zamani and his colleagues in the first half of this match: In the 2nd minute, the Fajar player brought down Ali Alipour in the penalty area, but the referee waived the announcement of a penalty in favor of the Reds.
According to Khabarozhi report, he emphasized: “There was no foul on the Persepolis player in the 6th minute.” This was while the referee ignored the announcement of a clear foul on Bifuma’s TV in the 14th minute.
Referring to the fact that Fajrspasi’s goal was legal and correct, this refereeing expert stated: In the 26th minute, there was no foul on Fajr’s player.
While stressing that the referee continued the game correctly in the 29th minute, Abolfazl Mordi deserved another yellow card and dismissal in the 37th minute, but I don’t know why the referee ignored Daniel Iri’s foul and returned the second yellow card to the Fajar player.
In the end, he said: The referee announced 6 minutes of wasted time in this half, which was too short for the wasted time in this half, and the referee should have announced at least 8 minutes of overtime.
This refereeing expert emphasized about the refereeing team’s judgment of this game in the second half: in the 49th minute, player number 6 Fajar should have been penalized with a yellow card due to preventing an effective attack.
He added: In the 61st minute, Mohammad Omari’s foul was correctly announced, while in the 67th minute, a foul occurred in the favor of Persepolis behind the penalty area.
Emphasizing that Persepolis’ goal scored in the 70th minute was legal, Rudneil stated: the referee should have penalized the Fajr player with a yellow card due to the foul that happened on Uston Ornov in the 71st minute.
In the end, he clarified: The referee announced 4 minutes of overtime in the second half, which was short considering the stoppages of the game in this half, and at least 6 minutes of overtime should have been announced for the second half.
