According to Khabaronline news agency, Abbas Golro, about witnessing new movements by mediators in the region to advance Negotiations between Iran and the United Stateswill these movements come to fruition or will we have to witness a new round of conflict between Iran and the United States, he said: the vibrancy and efforts of actors, mediators and mediators are commendable; But it is pointless because neither we live in another Korea nor the Americans live in another Korea, the demands are very close and exchanged.
According to Ilna’s report, this member of the National Security and Foreign Policy Commission recalled: The demand of the Islamic Republic of Iran, which was presented to the other side in New York, is very clear and explicit, the seven-day plan is for seven days, and it specifies what conditions the Americans must fulfill.
He continued: Americans want to take everything and give nothing; While according to the logic of what happened in the Ramadan war and the targeting and assassination of our beloved leader and commanders, such a crime would have happened in any other country in the world, they basically closed the door to negotiations. But we entered into negotiations for regional interests and according to the considerations we had, beyond what we should.
Gulro added: This issue is also clear, but the Americans do not respond to it; That is, they want to take all the rights of the Iranian nation and do not give an answer in return. In my opinion, it is clear that a certain country or a certain envoy will come to mediate. Iran’s last response was that the Americans respond to our plan and conditions.
He said about Iran’s conditions: Iran’s conditions are very clear, lifting the blockade and freeing Iran’s blocked money. Even if there is no talk of negotiation and there is no agreement, what is the meaning of taking the money of the Iranian people, which is the result of the sale of oil, and they have taken it hostage? The issue of lifting sanctions and passing through the Strait of Hormuz and the route that we have agreed on and which many and even the Americans themselves have accepted are among other issues. These are not difficult tasks.
We have not closed the way of diplomacy; The armed forces are ready
This member of the National Security and Foreign Policy Commission stated that Iran’s armed forces have the necessary preparation and said: “We are now fighting with the Americans around the clock in the Strait of Hormuz, and this means the readiness of our armed forces.” But on the other hand, we have not really closed the path of diplomacy.
Criticizing the American approach in the negotiations, he said: I think the Americans have gone too far in this regard. The main decision-maker of Trump’s policies is Netanyahu and Netanyahu himself. It is really ridiculous that a president like Trump, who does not have mercy on his own honor in his speeches, has turned to whims and ridiculous and disgusting behavior that has even been mocked by his own nation and is making fun of himself. We are on the side of such a beast.
Golro continued: They have come and want to negotiate; If there is to be a negotiation, there must be an exchange of interests. Everything is clear. In my opinion, they have really gone too far and there is no point in continuing this negotiation process.
Emphasizing the coherence in the country’s decision-making structure, he said: everyone has reached this conclusion and fortunately, in the structure of the Supreme National Security Council, the governance structure and the main decision-making centers, they are all coherent and there are no differences. As long as the Americans do not adhere to Iran’s terms, no other political process, neither at home nor abroad, will take place.
Withdrawal from the NPT requires compliance with legal requirements
In response to the fact that some experts say that basically when Iran is a member of the NPT, talking about the nuclear issue is a matter that has no place in the Arabs, and also that a number of representatives insist on Iran’s withdrawal from the NPT, whether it should be withdrawn or not, said: The issue of withdrawing from the NPT is not only a political and security issue, but also a technical one.
He emphasized: According to Article 10 of the NPT Treaty, a country whose interests are not secured and considers membership in the treaty to its detriment, and it has been completely detrimental to us, must present its declaration and statement three months in advance and announce its withdrawal. Of course, withdrawing from the NPT has requirements, and we hope that these requirements will be met and this issue will be realized.
31218
