Parviz Amini in a debate with Zeidabadi: If Larijani became the president instead of doctors, the administration of the country would be better / Larijani was the most important political character of the country + film

- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_img
- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_img



According to Khabaronline news agency, Parviz Amini, a principled political figure and sociologist In the Khabaronline debate about “people’s resilience in the current situation” with the presence of Ahmed Zeidabadi, a reformist political activist, he said: I am asking Mr. Zeidabadi if the situation he has drawn is correct; If Mr. Ali Larijani were the president instead of Mr. Medzikian, would the administration of the country be better, worse, or would it not make a difference? In my opinion, it would make a difference and the administration of the country would be better. With all the conditions and situations we are facing, if a person with the characteristics of Mr. Larijani was in the position of president, the administration of the country would probably go better.

He said: Mr. Larijani’s role was one of the important factors that prevented the rupture of the political structure in the 40-day war despite the heavy blow that was inflicted on the country. In a situation where the highest official of the country was assassinated and martyred, it was difficult to maintain the coherence of the political structure. Part of what caused the political structure to collapse and the society to reach relative cohesion was related to the role of Mr. Larijani.

This sociologist noted about Martyr Larijani: He also played an important role in talking to the people. Even after the 12-day war, in my opinion, Mr. Larijani conducted the best conversations with the people; Conversations that were effective in raising awareness, persuading public opinion, reducing anxiety and psychological pressure in society. He also played a role in analyzing the conditions and decisions related to the war, and immediately after that, in his first talks, he tried to give peace to the society. This is an important difference.

He said: Sometimes we make the issues so big and structured that there are no solutions left for them. In my opinion, Mr. Zeidabadi’s path is to explain the crisis and its dimensions in a structured manner that ultimately leads to the conclusion that nothing can be done; While I believe that there is a way, there is a possibility of opening and we must discover that possibility, have the will to realize it and stand on it.

This principled political activist emphasized: the country can be governed better than the current situation with the same conditions. This improvement may be two, three or four percent, but it is the same amount that matters. A large part of the country’s capacities are basically not included in the agenda. Our political environment is mainly involved in political conflicts and conflicts, and the issue of efficiency and existing capacities of the country has been neglected. I believe that Mr. Larijani was the most important political character of the country.

31215



Source link

- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_img
Latest news
- Advertisement -spot_img
Related news
- Advertisement -spot_img

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here