Alireza Najmi: Negotiations between Iran and America It has reached a critical point again; Will this diplomatic process be successful or will the tension between Iran and America rise?
Some media report the positive nature of the consultations and the possibility of an opening on the way to negotiations, and on the other hand, another group still considers the possibility of a military conflict to be more serious.
In the meantime, the visit of the Prime Minister of Qatar to Tehran and then his departure to America and the meeting with Donald Trump has once again drawn attention to the role of mediators in the recent developments. Movements that can be a sign of trying to keep open The path of diplomacy be
However, in the current tense atmosphere, it is not possible to reach the results of the negotiations simply from the continuation of the consultations. The main question is whether recent movements and Diplomatic meetings should be seen as a hopeful sign to reduce tension and reach an agreement, or are these visits part of the last efforts to manage a crisis that still has the possibility of turning into a full-scale war?
We have equipment and facilities that will definitely surprise Americans
In this regard Behnam Saeedi, member of the National Security Commission Emphasizing the unreliability of America, he told KhabarOnline: “Past experiences have shown that America is not trustworthy and seeks to put pressure on the Islamic Republic of Iran through military, negotiation or sanctions and somehow achieve a trump card that we believe it will never achieve.”
He added: “The Americans are testing the military option and negotiation at the same time, but they will not achieve anything in either of these two paths. If the United States wants to take military action, as the Supreme Leader said, the response of the Islamic Republic of Iran will be very strong and decisive and will not be limited to geographical borders.
Saidi continued: “This issue shows that the Islamic Republic of Iran has the ability to endanger the interests of the United States both in the region and outside it. “We have equipment and facilities that will definitely surprise the Americans.”
Referring to Iran’s defense capabilities, Behnam Saeedi said: “If America takes action, I believe it will face the capabilities that are being unveiled.” The countries of the region should also know that if they want to cooperate with America and the Zionist regime, the Islamic Republic of Iran will not have any consideration in this regard and will show a reaction that will be unimaginable for them.”
Regarding the negotiation process and Iran’s conditions, he added: “Iran’s position in the negotiations is clear and the conditions of the Islamic Republic of Iran have also been announced. “Americans have no choice but to accept these terms.”
Saidi continued: “Everyone believes, even the American people admit that this country has lost the war and has nothing to say on the battlefield.” We also saw the signs of this in the recent American elections; In my opinion, one of the reasons for the heavy defeat of the Republicans was the war with Iran. This war not only did not achieve anything for America, but also threatened the security and national interests of this country, and its costs for the American people were more than its benefits.
Americans have no choice but to surrender/Iran will not stop enriching
This member of the Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee emphasized: “The Americans have no choice but to submit to the will of the great nation of Iran and accept the conditions of the Islamic Republic of Iran.”
A member of the National Security and Foreign Policy Commission of the Islamic Council, emphasizing on increasing the country’s capabilities, said: “Iran today is definitely different from Iran before the war; Whether in terms of equipment, or in terms of resilience, tactical power, as well as intelligence monitoring of enemy forces. Therefore, our armed forces have their hands full and we can be militarily superior and even challenge the world economy.”
Referring to the naval blockade, he added: “The Americans should not think that they will achieve a result with the naval blockade. This siege has been going on for several months, but we see that the Islamic Republic of Iran is walking its path with dignity and pride. If there are problems, the American people are also facing the consequences of these conditions.”
Saeedi continued: “Surveys in America show that more than 70% of the people of this country are dissatisfied with the costs of the war with Iran, which directly affected their lives. They are also not satisfied with the president and the policies of their government.”
This member of the parliament’s national security and foreign policy commission said: “Therefore, we believe that any scenario that the Americans follow will have nothing but failure for them.”
A member of the National Security and Foreign Policy Commission of the Islamic Council, in response to a question about the possibility of an agreement between Iran and the United States on uranium enrichment to 3.5 percent, said: “Negotiations are ongoing, but what can be said clearly and decisively is that Iran will not stop enriching. We consider nuclear energy and enrichment as an industry for life; An industry that is tied to the life of our nation. “Today, no nation, country and government can manage even their daily life properly without peaceful nuclear energy.”
America is a defeated country and should give points to the victorious country
He added: “Therefore, it is clear that Iran will not give up nuclear energy and enrichment under any circumstances. But how the agreement will be done depends on the concessions that the Americans offer. This matter is important to us; Because the defeated country must give points to the victorious country.
Referring to the statements of some American analysts, Saeedi continued: “Even some American analysts believe that the United States has lost the battle with Iran and must accept painful concessions. In my opinion, since America has failed, it should give points.”
This member of the Parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission stated at the end: “However, regarding the enrichment and details of the agreement, the country’s officials will make the necessary decisions based on the three principles of honor, wisdom and expediency.”
29221
