According to Khabaronline news agency, Fadahossein Maliki, about that Leaving the NPT and changing the nuclear doctrine It is raised by some MPs, if the conflict between Iran and America continues, will we have a change in the nuclear doctrine or should we continue the way of negotiations? A subject that is associated with very bitter memories. This does not mean that we eliminate negotiation. We have to negotiate in the right place and with specific and specific issues. This issue has become established for our officials and should be given more attention.
According to Ilna’s narration, this member of the National Security and Foreign Policy Commission recalled: Considering the numerous renegades and broken promises that we have witnessed from the Americans in the past, the issue of NPT withdrawal or any other action should be on the agenda of the regime officials. Also, situations that may be felt to isolate us on the international stage are among the issues that need to be addressed.
He pointed out: On the other hand, in the last meeting we had with our senior nuclear officials, it was mentioned that any move in the war against us, we will use all our capacities at different stages; It means that we will not use all our power and facilities at once. This is a belief that exists in our country and it is natural that this issue can be very important for our enemies. The reason for the deterrence of the Americans and the fact that they are hitting both the nail and the shoe are the actions of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
In response to the fact that the Foreign Minister has raised the possibility of reopening the Strait of Hormuz for two days, can it be said that the path of negotiations is being taken more seriously? Because the load condition has a special meaning and message. When we raised the issue of condition, the Americans also entered the field and said very well, we also have conditions.
He emphasized: “Our terms were taken from the Islamabad negotiations and the memorandum, but the American terms were outside of the memorandum and related to the nuclear issue.” Therefore, we must be very careful that this does not happen.
This member of the National Security and Foreign Policy Commission emphasized: It is natural that in the current situation, we are not very optimistic due to the recent excesses of the Americans, which were transferred to Iran through the team of China, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. We should not place ourselves in the aura of negotiations; While during the meeting of the military commanders with the supreme leader of the revolution, which took place after the negotiations of various delegations and their arrival in Tehran, it was shown that Iran’s policy is different from what Trump sends a delegation to Iran at any moment.
Regarding the letter of J.D. Vance, Trump’s first vice president, to Mohsen Rezaei, the secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, he said: I am not optimistic about this issue and we should not be optimistic either. While being pessimistic, we must maintain our vigilance. I smell something bad from this letter. Of course, the letter has not yet been fully published, but we know some of its content.
Maliki said: What is certain is that we must be very careful; Because writing a letter with Mr. Rezaei means that the Americans are looking to create a new issue; An issue that can create differences and bipolarity in our society. Therefore, we must be careful.
29218
